← All articles Advanced ECG

VT vs SVT with Aberrancy: Using the Brugada Algorithm

April 13, 2026 8 min read By the CardioLens Team

A wide-complex tachycardia on the monitor. Patient is borderline hemodynamically stable. You have about 30 seconds to decide: is this ventricular tachycardia, or supraventricular tachycardia with aberrant conduction?

Get it right, and the patient receives appropriate treatment. Get it wrong — treat VT as SVT with a calcium channel blocker — and you can precipitate cardiovascular collapse.

This is why Pedro Brugada and colleagues published their now-classic 4-step algorithm in 1991. It remains one of the most practical diagnostic tools in emergency electrocardiography.

Why This Matters

Wide-complex tachycardia (QRS >120 ms) is VT until proven otherwise. Studies show VT accounts for approximately 80% of wide-complex tachycardias in the general population — and closer to 95% in patients with known structural heart disease.

Yet in emergency settings, wide-complex tachycardia is frequently misdiagnosed as SVT with aberrancy. The cost of this error can be catastrophic. Giving verapamil to a patient in VT can cause profound hypotension and cardiac arrest.

The Brugada Algorithm: 4 Steps

Step 1: Absence of RS Complex in All Precordial Leads

Look at leads V1–V6. If none of them show a typical RS complex (an R wave followed by an S wave), it's VT. Stop here.

If any precordial lead shows an RS, move to Step 2.

Step 2: R-to-S Interval >100 ms

In any precordial lead that has an RS complex, measure from the onset of the R wave to the nadir (bottom) of the S wave. If this interval is >100 ms (more than 2.5 small boxes) in any lead, it's VT. Stop here.

If ≤100 ms in all precordial leads, move to Step 3.

Step 3: AV Dissociation

Is there evidence of AV dissociation? Look for:

If any of these are present, it's VT. Stop here. If absent, move to Step 4.

Step 4: Morphology Criteria

Look at V1 and V6 and apply specific morphology rules:

Right Bundle Branch Block pattern (positive QRS in V1):

Left Bundle Branch Block pattern (negative QRS in V1):

If any of these morphology criteria are met, it's VT. If none are met, the rhythm is SVT with aberrancy.

Other Red Flags for VT

If the patient has a history of MI, heart failure, or structural heart disease — treat wide-complex tachycardia as VT unless you have overwhelming evidence otherwise. The clinical context is often more predictive than any algorithm.

Other findings that strongly favor VT:

A Common Mistake

Clinicians sometimes treat unstable wide-complex tachycardia with adenosine "to see what happens." This is dangerous. While adenosine will terminate most SVTs and reveal the underlying rhythm in SVT with aberrancy, giving it to a patient in VT can cause significant hemodynamic compromise — or accelerate the VT in rare cases.

When unstable: synchronized cardioversion is always appropriate regardless of whether it's VT or SVT. When stable: the Brugada algorithm gives you a defensible pathway to the right answer.

Key Takeaway

Wide-complex tachycardia is VT until proven otherwise. Apply the Brugada algorithm in 4 steps: absence of RS in precordial leads → R-to-S interval >100 ms → AV dissociation → morphology criteria. When the patient is unstable, cardiovert. When stable, diagnose before you treat.

Practicing in CardioLens

The VT vs SVT Brugada Algorithm module inside CardioLens walks through each step interactively with paired strips showing real RBBB-pattern VT, LBBB-pattern VT, and SVT with aberrancy. The ACLS Tachycardia algorithm links directly to the relevant rhythm examples, and MEGA CODES includes scenarios where you must decide between cardioversion and medication based on your wide-complex diagnosis.

Download CardioLens

AI-powered ECG analysis for healthcare professionals. Free to download.

Download on iOS

Sources: AHA/ACC/HRS Guidelines for ECG Interpretation · Braunwald's Heart Disease, 12th Edition · Dubin's Rapid Interpretation of EKGs, 6th Edition